Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZynAddSubFx filter frequency set to 127 #7381

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor

@bratpeki bratpeki commented Jul 15, 2024

I'm tying this PR to the ZynAddSubFX PR #23. These two PRs aim to disable the default lowpass filter applied to Zyn's three synths, as well as keeping the possibility of filter automation without affecting Zyn internally.

There is only one change in this PR specifically, that being that the filter frequency is set to the maximum value of 127, as per Lost Robot's suggestion in the Discord server.

image

@super-manis
Copy link

super-manis commented Jul 15, 2024

Would it be, by any chance, nicer to set the default wave to Power instead of Sine as well?

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 16, 2024

I've noticed that the plugin still treats the filter frequency knob as if it were set to 64. Only when the knob is moved does the change happen.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here a link to an MMPZ file proving that this even stays after saving. Will investigate further.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've saved the MMPZ as an MMP and am reading it.

The first XML entry after each <instrument name="zynaddsubfx">, for all three instances of Zyn, reads the following:

freq set to 64:
<zynaddsubfx portamento="0" resbandwidth="64" bandwidth="64" filterfreq="64" modifiedcontrollers="74," filterq="64" rescenterfreq="64" fmgain="127" forwardmidicc="1">

freq set to 127:
<zynaddsubfx portamento="0" resbandwidth="64" bandwidth="64" filterfreq="127" modifiedcontrollers="74," filterq="64" rescenterfreq="64" fmgain="127" forwardmidicc="1">

knob not touched:
<zynaddsubfx portamento="0" resbandwidth="64" bandwidth="64" filterfreq="127" modifiedcontrollers="" filterq="64" rescenterfreq="64" fmgain="127" forwardmidicc="1">

The first two have had their "Filter frequency" knobs moved (indicated by modifiedcontrollers="74,").

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 16, 2024

plugins/ZynAddSubFx/ZynAddSubFx.cpp, line 123:

connect( &m_filterFreqModel, SIGNAL( dataChanged() ), this, SLOT( updateFilterFreq() ), Qt::DirectConnection );

This would explain why a change to the knob pointed to by m_filterFreqModel would result in the update of the filter frequency.

updateFilterFreq() is defined in the same file, on line 418:

GEN_CC_SLOT(updateFilterFreq,C_filtercutoff,m_filterFreqModel);

The GEN_CC_SLOT macro expands to:

void ZynAddSubFxInstrument::updateFilterFreq() {														 
    sendControlChange( C_filtercutoff, m_filterFreqModel.value() );
    m_modifiedControllers[C_filtercutoff] = true;
}

A hacky approach would be to call updateFilterFreq() from the initialization method of the plugin, although it should be possible to find the root cause of the issue and avoid that call.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 16, 2024

Indeed, in the same file, in ZynAddSubFxInstrument::ZynAddSubFxInstrument, adding updateFilterFreq(); to the end of the method body fixes the issue.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found the root! It's in plugins/ZynAddSubFx/zynaddsubfx/src/Params/Controller.cpp under Controller::defaults() and Controller::resetall(). I'll update my ZynAddSubFx PR accordingly.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

Didn't you want to upgrade the submodule? You can reference it right now, assuming we will likely do an FF-merge in the zyn repo.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 16, 2024

Could you point me to some resource regarding that? I'm failing to understand how I could do that, given that the "zynaddsubfx" PR is not merged.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

After trying, I was unable to update the LMMS zynaddsubfx submodule. Is it possible for someone more experienced to assist me with this?

@Rossmaxx
Copy link
Contributor

IMO, you should wait till the other PR is merge.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Likewise, zynaddsubfx first, then update the submodule, then merge this.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

This should work (if not we can still fix later):

  1. Go to the submodule
  2. Checkout the version that you want to use (I assume that the submodule has already been pushed)
  3. Go back to lmms
  4. git add the submodule
  5. git commit
  6. git push

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 17, 2024

Attempting to use the method you described prompted me with fatal: 'plugins/ZynAddSubFx/zynaddsubfx' already exists in the index.

To elaborate further, checking out was not possible, because my changes to zynaddsubfx weren't yet approved. I tried using git subdmoule add [url to my fork], which gave me the error above. git rm plugins/ZynAddSubFx/zynaddsubfx followed by git submodule add ... also wasn't successful.

I ended up using git submodule set-url plugins/ZynAddSubFx/zynaddsubfx https://github.com/bratpeki/zynaddsubfx. This has updated .gitmodules. Is this what you had in mind? If not, I will make further changes.

My assumption is that, if the zynaddsubfx changes are excepted, then I can update the lmms submodule accordingly. The zynaddsubfx repo is waiting on your approval.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

My fork of LMMS is now pointing to the master commit of my fork of Zyn!

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

I ended up using git submodule set-url plugins/ZynAddSubFx/zynaddsubfx https://github.com/bratpeki/zynaddsubfx. This has updated .gitmodules. Is this what you had in mind? If not, I will make further changes.

Sorry, I forgot that this requires switching the forks. It is not good to set the URL of the submodule to your fork, because in the end, it should point to ours. I now pushed branch filterfreq to our fork, with the content of your branch. If you manage to link to that from this branch (probably this requires you again to set-url back to our fork), then it should be alright...

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

That should be it! Here's a link to the tree, to make things easier!

.gitmodules Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

This PR seems buggy. I do this:

  1. Open LMMS
  2. Add a Zyn instance to the instruments
  3. Open Zyn UI, go to global AD synth, look at Filterfreq

Observations:

  1. The knob is not at maximum (as the PR suggests?)
  2. The knob does not behave linear, but rather logarithmic (or exponential?)

Can this be confirmed? Or did I do anything wrong? At least, the behavior is correct on branch lv2-ui, which is very close to master.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Your statements are correct, the change in the frequency relating to LMMS is only in regard to the FREQ knob in the Zyn LMMS UI (red box in the image at the top). Lost checked that 100 is the best value for the ADDSynth, SUBSynth and PADSynth filter, as it makes sense in the context of automation as well as not making the signal lowpassed, so I set them to 100. The change that should be noticed is that none of the synths are lowpassed, as was the case previously.

The change to ADD-, SUB- and PADSynth is in the zynaddsubfx repo, of course.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

I don't understand. Can you reproduce my issue? If yes, IMO this should be fixed. I can't imagine that Lost planned that?

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll try to explain.

By default, Zyn's synths are lowpassed, with Add having a filterfreq vaule of 94, IIRC. Understandably, having the signal lowpassed implies that the signal has been edited from the standard sine wave before you did anything. I aimed to correct that. Initially, I set all the filterfreq's to 127, but Lost pointed out that that would not allow for neatly automating the signal, as made evident by these Discord messages:

Lost Robot — 07/13/2024 7:24 PM
Approximately values 80-127 from LMMS's FREQ knob will have no impact by default if ZynAddSubFX's internal knob value is set to 127 by default.

Lost Robot — 07/13/2024 7:27 PM
Yes. I recommend all three of those having a default value of 100 and LMMS's FREQ knob having a default value of 127.

I did as Lost suggested, which is what the two PRs I made are.

Tres made it clear that this is changed in Zyn-Fusion, so this is simply a small patch to make Zyn more user-friendly until it's is updated.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should now really be it! Both here and in the Zyn repo.

Copy link
Contributor

@JohannesLorenz JohannesLorenz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing and Code OK.

While awaiting the latest build, can you please formulate a commit message for squash? Like

one-line description
<empty line>
optional
longer
description

Thanks.

In this repo, the only changes made are updating the according submodule
and changing the FREQ knob in ZynAddSubFx's LMMS GUI.
@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

bratpeki commented Jul 19, 2024

Same as in the other repo, I am terribly sorry for misunderstanding your comment.
The commit message is:

Made it so ZynAddSubFx isn't lowpassed by default

In this repo, the only changes made are updating the according submodule
and changing the FREQ knob in ZynAddSubFx's LMMS GUI.

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

After the Zyn PR is merged, the submodule here has to be updated, after which this can be merged as well.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

OK, please update the submodule reference now.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

I think that went wrong? I guess it should point to 9499523f70322b6034673566898300e7543fdf3e now, because this is the repo's master?

@bratpeki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe it does, here's the tree of my fork.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

Now I see it, thanks.

@JohannesLorenz JohannesLorenz merged commit 9c0fc8f into LMMS:master Jul 20, 2024
1 check passed
JohannesLorenz added a commit to JohannesLorenz/lmms that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
Fixup of commit 9c0fc8f
@JohannesLorenz JohannesLorenz mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2024
JohannesLorenz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
Fixup of commit 9c0fc8f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants